Critique research paper medical
There was no effect size is listed for the study.
How to critique an abstract
The ecological generaliziability for the study is fairly high. Junior high coaches also demonstrated a lesser degree of social support than either the high school or college coaches. Coaching experience would greatly effect the responses of the participants, yet this was not considered in the study. Is each result discussed in terms of the original hypothesis to which it relates? The surveys were mailed out, and returned on a volunteer basis. The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership behaviors, using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale RLSS , between male and female coaches and among different coaching levels. Certain schools have better athletes and programs in a particular sport, while others may not be able to field a winning team. It would have also been possible to actually go to individual schools and meet with the coaches as a group to administer surveys.
Certain coaching styles are more applicable for individual sports wrestling, track, and tennis than for team sports football, soccer, and basketball. A larger sample with regard to all categories would have aided in the data analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching level.
If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given? Once again, a better analysis method could have been chosen based on the nature of the data collected.
Critical review of a research paper example pdf
In addition, bringing coaches together to a common setting could have reduced location threat. Discussion This should show insight into the meaning and significance of the research findings. Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described? If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given? Introduction This should include: Evidence of a literature review that is relevant and recent, critically appraising other works, not merely describing them Background information to the study, to orientate the reader to the problem Hypothesis or aims of the study Rationale for the study that justifies its need, i. There may also be recommendations for further research. Scales were administered in a number of environmental settings: classrooms, gymnasiums, practice fields, and offices. Publication bias can occur when editors only accept manuscripts that have a bearing on the direction of their own research, or reject manuscripts with negative findings. The numerous potential threats to internal validity need to be addressed and minimized where possible. Conclusions These should be clearly stated and will only be valid if the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size.
Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for? Are the size and major characteristics of the population studied described? What proportion of the eligible sample participated? The nature of the sport could also be critical.
This could present a threat to the internal validity in that participants might not have been entirely focused on completing the scale, but instead on coordinating practice, completing paperwork, etc.
based on 39 review